|

|
| Roger Ebert |
“The Great Debaters” is about an underdog debate team that wins a national championship, and some critics have complained that it follows the formula of all sports movies by leading up, through great adversity, to a victory at the end. So it does.
How many sports movies, or movies about underdogs competing in any way, have you seen that end in defeat? It is human nature to seek inspiration in victory, and this is a film that is affirming and inspiring and re-creates the stories of a remarkable team and their coach.
The team is from little Wiley College in Marshall, Texas, an
African-American institution in the heart of the Jim Crow South of the
1930s. The school’s English professor, Melvin Tolson (Denzel
Washington), is a taskmaster who demands the highest standards from his
debate team, and they’re rewarded with a national championship. That’s
what the “sports movie” is about, but the movie is about so much more,
and in ways that do not follow formulas.
There are, for example, Tolson’s secret lives. Dressed in overalls and
work boots, he ventures out incognito as an organizer for a national
sharecropper’s union. He’s a dangerous radical, the local whites
believe, probably a communist. But he’s organizing both poor whites and
blacks, whose servitude is equal. He keeps his politics out of the
classroom, however, where he conceals a different kind of secret: He is
one of America’s leading poets.
Yes, although the movie barely touches
on it, Tolson published long poems in such magazines as The Atlantic
Monthly, and in 1947 was actually named poet laureate of Liberia.
Ironic, that his role as a debate coach would win him greater fame
today.
 debaters.jpg |
Nate Parker (center, with Jurnee Smollett) plays a star student at an African-American college that beats Harvard’s debate team in the 1930s in ‘The Great Debaters.’
|
He holds grueling auditions and selects four team members: Henry Lowe
(Nate Parker), who drinks and fools around but is formidably
intelligent; Hamilton Burgess (Jermaine Williams), a superb debater;
James Farmer Jr. (Denzel Whitaker), a precocious 14-year-old who is
their researcher; and Samantha Booke (Jurnee Smollett), the substitute
and only female debater they’ve heard of. Tolson drills them,
disciplines them, counsels them, and leads them to a string of
victories that results in a triumph over Harvard, the national champion.
We get a good sense of the nurturing black community that has produced
these students, in particular James Farmer Sr. (Forest Whitaker), a
preacher (young Denzel Whitaker, as his son, is no relation, and not
named after Washington, for that matter). James Jr. would go on to
found the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE). Tolson drives his team on
long road trips to out-of-town debates, and one night traveling late,
they have the defining emotional experience of the film: They happen
upon a scene where a white mob has just lynched a black man and set his
body afire. They barely escape with their own lives. And daily life for
them is fraught with racist peril; especially for Tolson, who has been
singled out by the local sheriff as a rabble-rouser. These experiences
inform their debates as much as formal research.
The movie is not really about how this team defeats the national
champions. It is more about how its members, its coach, its school and
community believe that an education is their best way out of the morass
of racism and discrimination. They would find it unthinkable that
decades in the future, serious black students would be criticized by
jealous contemporaries for “acting white.” They are black, proud,
single-minded, focused, and it all expresses itself most dramatically
in their debating.
The debates themselves have one peculiarity: The Wiley team always
somehow draws the “good” side of every question. Since a debate team is
supposed to defend whatever position it draws, it might have been
intriguing to see them defend something they disbelieve, even despise.
Still, I suppose I understand why that isn’t done here; it would have
interrupted the flow. And the flow becomes a mighty flood, in a
powerful and impassioned story. This is one of the year’s best films.
Note: In actual fact, the real Wiley team did beat the national
champions, but from USC, not Harvard.
Screenwriter Robert Eisele
explains, “In that era, there was much at stake when a black college
debated any white school, particularly one with the stature of Harvard.
We used Harvard to demonstrate the heights they achieved.”
•
Roger Ebert, a Pulitzer Prize-winning film critic, is a syndicated columnist based at the Chicago Sun-Times.
|