|
 |
| D.G. Martin |
CHAPEL HILL — This time last year, most Americans, whatever their political persuasions, celebrated the Martin Luther King Holiday with a special good feeling that King would share the nation’s pride at inauguration of a Negro President of the United States.
Of course, even though “Negro” is the word King used to describe an American with African ancestry, it is no longer accepted as a positive term.
Senator Harry Reid found this out when a new book, “Game Change,” by journalists John Heilemann and Mark Halperin, disclosed his remarks about Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential candidacy.
The selective quotes in news stories about Reid’s references to Obama’s being a “light-skinned…with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one” implied that Reid’s intention was to demean Obama or African Americans in general.
Reid quickly apologized. The President was gracious, but a firestorm of
criticism of Reid’s supposed racism exploded like a fire in a forest
covered with dry underbrush. I think Reid got a raw deal.
Before you disagree, read a more detailed excerpt from the book, which
asserts that with respect to Obama’s candidacy, Reid’s “encouragement
of Obama was unequivocal. He was wowed by Obama’s oratorical gifts and
believed that the country was ready to embrace a black presidential
candidate, especially one such as Obama -- a ‘light-skinned’ African
American ‘with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one,’ as he
said privately. Reid was convinced, in fact, that Obama’s race would
help him more than hurt him in a bid for the Democratic nomination.”
I took note of several things.
First, when many, maybe most, people still thought that no black man or
woman, whatever his or her qualifications, could win a presidential
election, Reid believed and actively tried to persuade others that
Obama had a real chance.
Second, Reid’s political assessment was correct. Every successful black
political candidate running in white majority districts pays attention
to the facts as Reid laid them out. Speaking “the white dialect.”
dressing conservatively, and close-cut grooming is a must to overcome
the race-based resistance that still affects some white voters. Paying
attention to the things that are important to white voters is part of
the drill to open the door for the black candidate to run on his or her
merits. It might not be right or fair. But it is a fact.
Third, Reid’s indication that Obama’s “light-skin” would make it easier
for him was not an assertion that “light-skin” made him better. Nor was
it a statement that whites or blacks should rate people by their colors
or shades. Sadly, some whites and blacks still do.
Thankfully, things have been changing on that front.
A few days ago, the Daily Tar Heel ran a story about freshman Shaun
Scott, a member of Carolina’s JV basketball team and the son of
basketball legend Charlie Scott.
Here is a part of that story, written by Anna Kim:
“In 1995, the Scott family attended a basketball team reunion. At every
turn, photographs depicted Charlie Scott, the sole black player,
surrounded by his white teammates. Shaun, 4, stood with his 6-year-old
sister Simone, staring at a team photo. He had one burning question.
“‘Which one’s Daddy?’
“‘Shaun,’ Simone answered. ‘You know Daddy wears number 33.’
“Their mother let out a laugh and took note. The Scott children didn’t see color. They saw numbers.”
Someday, hopefully, all of us will, like the Scott family, see numbers and not colors.
Until then, we are going to have to keep working to make things better, and keep talking to each other—and listening more.
But, until then, political candidates who want to win should take account of the facts as they are, not just as they should be.
•
D.G. Martin is the host of UNC-TV’s North Carolina Bookwatch, which
airs Sundays at 5 p.m. Check his blog and view prior programs at
www.unctv.org/ncbookwatch/
|