|

|
John North
Editor & Publisher |
Traffic engineers are always experimenting with ways to make the roads safer. The latest twist I read about — experimenting with fake speed bumps — really stopped me short.
I mean, what’s next — virtual traffic lights and cardboard-cutout police cars?
In case you missed the story by The Associated Press, some smaller experiments with optical-illusion speed bumps in Phoenix two years ago are now being followed up by a much larger experiment in northeastern Philadelphia.
The Phoenix project showed that the painted-on “bumps” slowed the traffic, at least temporarily.
Now the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration wants to find
out if the three-dimensional-seeming marks also will reduce pedestrian
accidents.
If they are shown to slow traffic and reduce accidents, then
government officials will be delighted to put them into use —
especially because, at $60 to $80 each, they are much less expensive
than conventional speed bumps, which cost between $1,000 and $1,500.
The trompe-l’oeil versions also reportedly require little maintenance.
In Phoenix, the experiment found that the special markers
resulted in a doubling of drivers who obeyed a 25-mph speed limit,
although the effect wore off after a few months.
To counteract the lessening of the novelty effect — after which
motorists are inclined to start ignoring the markings — Philadelphia
authorities are adding a publicity campaign to let drivers know that
the phony bumps will be followed up with real police officers.
To improve their nighttime visibility, the Japanese-made markers contain reflective glass beads.
Still, The AP reported that only a few of nearly two dozen
people interviewed in Philadelphia reported slowing down for a virtual
speed bump.
Here in Asheville, our intrepid drivers face a smorgasbord of
the more traditional — and expensive — traffic-calming devices, such as
various types of bumps, dips, traffic circles and roundabouts.
While I am among the cheerleaders for the virtual speed bumps
because I think they can be both effective and cost-effective, I can’t
help but wonder how far such low-tech solutions might go in our
high-tech-worshipping society.
•
John North, publisher and editor of the Daily Planet, may be contacted at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
|