|
Itís hard to miss all the news lately about development in Asheville. While some residents call for higher buildings and more urban density, others decry such structures as the 130-foot Ellington building planned for downtown.
Nonetheless, there is one building about which† Ashevillians seem to have formed a united opinion: the Staples building on Merrimon Avenue.
In short, the people of Asheville hate it. The building has been the source of unceasing public outcry since its construction.
In fact, in a recent survey of Merrimon Avenue residents and business owners, the Staples building ranked as the worst example of development along the corridor by a significant margin.
Thatís why it seemed particularly odd to hear that among the proposals
being touted by some community activists is a plan that would require
that buildings be set right up against the road, with parking in the
rear. In other words, built like Staples.
These advocates of so-called ìNew Urbanismî say that doing so will
create a more pedestrian-friendly environment, eventually allowing
Merrimon residents to shop, dine and get to work all without ever
getting into a car.
We find such claims highly dubious.
While it is clear that Merrimon Avenue is far from desirable in regard
to pedestrian access, it is not at all clear that more Staples-like
buildings will help the problem.
Trying to walk between a busy street and a brick edifice hardly gives
one a sense of security. At least with a parking lot on the side, one
has a hope of dodging a stray car that veers off the road.
And as much as we dislike the un-Ashevillian drabness of the Staples
building, using legislation to mandate Merrimon Avenueís aesthetics
would also be walking a very tricky line. On the one hand, defining
beauty according to one groupís narrow set of opinions could be
expensive and a violation of property ownersí rights.
But on the other, allowing cheap, ugly buildings to proliferate
unchecked violates a communityís right to its unique identity ó an
economically valuable right, in Ashevilleís case.
Clearly, all sides deserve a hearing in this debate.
|