|
By JIM GENARO
Differing opinions about development and the impact of growth on Ashevilleís future clashed last Wednesday as the six remaining candidates for City Council participated in a debate at UNC Ashevilleís Reuter Center.
About 150 people attended the event, which was sponsored by the League of Women Voters and Kids Voting.
Incumbents Jan Davis, Bryan Freeborn and Brownie Newman were joined by Elaine Lite, Dwight Butner and Bill Russell.
Questions were gathered from audience members, and some were asked on behalf of the two sponsors.
The first question, which was asked by the LWV, was, ìWhen a developer
asks for permission to rezone land ... what criteria would you use in
deciding how to respond?î
Butner, who described himself as a ìpretty big property-rights person,î
said he would be ìextremely reluctantî to approve rezonings, but would
do so if the surrounding community supported it.
 candidates.jpg
Lite, Russell and Newman all echoed this sentiment, saying they would
approve changes that were supported by the neighborhood in question.
Meanwhile, Davis said the cityís Unified Development Ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan should guide the process, as well as the
recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Board and city staff.
Freeborn said that one example of a positive rezoning was The Village
on Haywood Road, which he said was planned with the help of community
members.
ìThey worked with their neighbors,î Freeborn said. ìThey didnít force a particular type of development.î
One of the youths involved in Kids Voting posed the question, ìWhat are you going to do about gang violence in Asheville?î
ìIím not sure anyone here knows what to do about gang violence,î Davis said.
However, he added that more jobs, vocational training for kids and
financial support for programs that provide alternatives for kids are
crucial to combatting the problem.
Freeborn said that council should better fund law enforcement, but added, ìthatís only part of prevention.î
Newman agreed, saying, ìThe police cannot solve these problems by
themselves, but we need to give police the resources they need.î
He also urged hiring more African-Americans on the police department, particularly in leadership roles.
Lite said that after-school programs need more funding.
Butner took a more philosophical tack, saying, ìWeíve somehow learned
that the way to resolve conflict is to overwhelm your opponent.î
By contrast, he said, conflict resolution is ìbased on seeing othersí opinions.î
Russell said that a lack of economic opportunity contributes to gang problems.
ìDrug money is appealing,î he conceded. ìYou can go work all day at
Hardees and make $60 or you can go out and work one night (dealing
drugs) and make $200.î
A questioner from the audience noted that greater density of buildings is said to limit sprawl.
The questioner went on to say, ìIt seems that Asheville and the
surrounding community are getting both. What is your vision for keeping
Asheville unique?î
Russell said he prefers ìthe middle roadî ó building density, but not too much.
ìSixty people living in a building on Coxe Avenue is better than 60 people living on 60 acres out in Beaverdam,î Russell said.
Newman said that the city needs to work with the county to ask where it wants to grow and where it does not.
He said growth should happen downtown in the city, but not in
residential neighborhoods on steep slopes or on existing farmlands.
However, Newman added, these efforts ìneed to be coordinated with the county.î
Lite contested the premise of the question, saying, ìI think it is a
myth that building densely downtown will prevent urban sprawl.î
She said the region is experiencing both and that the only viable
solution is a temporary moratorium on building while the city and
county develop a master plan.
Freeborn and Davis also emphasized the need for a master plan, but
noted that the city is limited by state laws which prohibit it from
charging more for water rates to new developments outside of existing
water lines.
ìThe state has put Asheville and Buncombe County in quite a pickle,î Freeborn said.
Meanwhile, Butner disputed the idea that Asheville is experiencing
rapid growth. He noted that the cityís population has grown about one
percent per year over the past 16 years.
Most of that, he added, was through annexation.
A questioner asked what can be done to keep Asheville affordable for people with low to moderate incomes.
Butner said the city needs ìa simplified, streamlined UDOî and needs to
establish a down-payment-assistance program whereby the city
contributes a 10 percent down payment for homeowners and then collects
10 percent of the sale price when the owners sell it.
Davis focused on jobs, saying that the city makes it very hard for new companies to relocate here.
Freeborn argued that the key to getting better jobs in Asheville is to
improve quality of life by promoting public transit, greenways and
other amenities that will make companies want to move to the area.
Russell said that there is no way to lower housing costs, so the city should focus on raising incomes.
Lite proposed a city-funded land trust and inclusionary zoning that
would require developers to build a certain percentage of housing at
affordable rates.
One of the Kids Voting students asked, ìWhat is one issue that would come first on your priority list in the city?î
Russell said that completion of a plan for I-26 was his main priority.
Newman agreed that I-26 is ìthe single most important development
decisionî facing the city, but accused Russell of being too willing to
accept quick solutions that would not serve the cityís interests.
Lite said that land planning is the most important issue the city
faces. She expressed dismay that council had approved construction of
The Ellington the night before without a master plan for development.
ìI think weíre just like a freight train heading for a wall,î she added.
Freeborn also said a master develolpment plan for the region is his highest priority.
Jan Davis said his number-one issue is the ìlack of equitable treatmentî from the state and county.
An unwillingness on the part of county residents to pay fairly for
social and cultural amenities, such as city parks and the Civic Center,
has led to a ìvery stratifiedî division of poor and wealthy residents,
he said.
Butner said his main issue is the ability of young people to afford starter homes.
A questioner asked Lite what guiding principles should be used for developing rules about growth along Merrimon Avenue.
She responded that the Merrimon Study Group ó a citizensí organization
that had recommended a number of changes to council ó had spent two
years developing strategies for Merrimon. Their ideas and their efforts
should be respected, Lite argued.
She noted that when council considered the groupís proposals, it
decided not to approve them after there was some ìconfusion by business
ownersî along Merrimon Avenue.
Davis, who noted he had worked with the MSG two years ago, conceded
that there was ìa lot of misunderstandingî about the groupís proposals.
But he added that for the business owners in question, ìthat property is their life. Iím not going to rush to judgement.î
A questioner asked about tensions between council members and the county commissioners.
Davis said that the perceived problems are not as bad as they seem, and
that there are many friendships among members of the two boards.
However, he conceded, ìthere are some cultural differences.î
Freeborn agreed, saying that much of the dispute has been overemphasized by the media.
The next questioner asked whether the candidates would support an
official registry of same-sex couples and extending benefits to
same-sex partners of city employees.
Freeborn said he would support doing so. ìThe government doesnít care
what your church has to say,î he told the audience. ìThey just want to
know if you paid your county fees.î
Newman agreed, saying that ìall people that do the same job ... should get the same pay and benefits.î
Lite answered simply, ìYes and yes.î
|