|
We are opposed to Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain’s proposal to suspend the gas tax — and to cut several other taxes — this summer because, like an alcoholic reeling out of control on booze, the United States needs to kick its addiction to petroleum.
Our opposition should not be misconstrued as an endorsement of McCain’s Democratic rivals, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, nor does it mean that we are necessarily opposed to McCain’s candidacy as the presumptive nominee for his party for the presidency.
In a time when discipline and good sense desperately need to be
restored to the federal government, McCain could not be any less subtle
in his pandering to the voters by offering gas-tax relief during the
summer lead-up time to November’s presidential election.
Specifically, he called on Senate colleagues to join him in supporting
the Kyle-McCain amendment to H.R. 1195, the Highway Technical
Corrections Bill. The Gas Tax Holiday Amendment would suspend the 18.4
cents per gallon federal gas tax between Memorial Day and Labor Day
2008.
This summer, considering that the arduous process involved in airplane
travel these days has dragged it from its onetime perch of lofty
comfort down to the level of riding on a gritty cross-country bus, even
more Americans than usual will probably choose to drive their cars to
summer vacation spots — a reality from which McCain might be hoping to
benefit politically.
Surely, McCain also is well aware that the polls show that the nation’s
financial woes have replaced the Iraq war as the top concern for
voters. Therefore, since his stance on continuing the war in Iraq is
highly unpopular, he is going for the easy applause line by offering a
proposal that would lower gas prices immediately.
While we all would love to lessen the ever-increasing pain at the pump,
McCain’s quick-fix plan would backfire in the following ways:
• It would cost the federal government an estimated $9 billion, which
would otherwise go to roads, bridges and other badly needed
infrastructure improvements, while increasing the already enormous
federal deficit that will have to be shouldered by our children and
their children — and beyond.
• It would amount to a government-sanctioned incentive for the public
to drive gas-guzzling vehicles and for car manufacturers to continue
making them — at a time when even President George Bush, a former Texas
oilman, acknowledges that the U.S. needs to cut back its greenhouse-gas
emissions.
• It would camouflage and likely divert public attention from the
obscene world-record profits that oil companies and oil-price
speculators are making off the breaking backs of the increasingly
impoverished, but still car-dependent, American public.
Call us cynics, but McCain’s timing for issuing his proposal — April
15, the tax-filing deadline — pretty much exposes his short-term
political motivations. There’s no well-thought-out plan here for
long-term economic renewal — not to mention any lasting solution to the
need for alternative energy sources.
But then McCain is the man who has famously admitted that economics is
not one of his strong suits — and this proposal surely proves his point.
|