From Staff Reports

After hearing last-minute comments pro and con from residents just before the vote, the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners on May 1 gave final approval to the first-ever zoning ordinance for the county.

The measure was approved 3-1, with board Chairman Nathan Ramsey casting the opposition vote. Those voting for regulating land use included David Gantt, David Young and Carol Peterson. The fifth commissioner, Bill Stanley, missed the meeting because of an out-of-town funeral.

The previous week, the commissioners gave preliminary approval ó on a narrow 3-2 vote ó to pass the zoning law, with Stanley and Ramsey casting the dissenting votes. That action followed a sometimes stormy public hearing that lasted more than 3.5 hours and drew more than 400 people, most of whom opposed the plan. Passage of the ordinance required a second vote. Just before the final May 1 vote, resident John Herron told the commissioners he opposed zoning because ìitís getting us in a communist situation.î

Conversely, resident Steve Sloan praised the board for having the ìvision and the courageî to enact zoning.

In voting for zoning, Gantt said, ìI think itís a tool we need to protect our mountainsî

In contrast, Ramsey said he opposed the ordinance ó in part ó because it would increase the cost of housing. Also, he said the board should have had the voters decide the matter. (In 1999, 55 percent of Buncombe voters opposed zoning in a non-binding referendum.)

As for concerns raised that some commissioners should have recused themselves from voting on the ordinance, County Attorney Joe Connelly said he saw no conflicts.

For instance, resident Peggy Bennett said Young owns an interest in a mobile home park, while the ordinance prohibits new mobile homes in a portion of the county.

Connelly said there are 627 mobile home parks in Buncombe and that Young does not stand to profit from the ordinance. The same reasoning, he said, holds true for concerns about Ramseyís ownership of 190 acres that he plans to sell to a developer, and Petersonís ownership of a farm.

Following approval of the ordinance, a certificate of zoning compliance is now required from the county to erect, move, add to or alter any structure in portions of the county served by the Metropolitan Sewerage District.

More-rural areas are covered by the less-restrictive Open Use District regulating high-impact land uses, such as asphalt plants, mining operations and chip mills.
†